Identify the affected movement
Connect the exception to the load, site, stream, pickup, receiver, and evidence reference.
Turn a photo or receiver rejection into a reviewable decision with material context, severity, ownership, due date, disposition, responsibility, and follow-up.
The example includes a high-severity receiver rejection, a low-severity food-stream coaching case, and a disputed weight variance under native review workflow.
Free for up to five users. No credit card required.
Adapt fields, workflows, and dashboards without code. Explore 1,000+ app templates and use cases
Inspect fictional evidence, review decisions, responsibility, and corrective action.
Severity and responsibility should remain separate decisions.
| Signal | What to inspect | Decision or next action |
|---|---|---|
| Minor removable contamination | Photo, material profile, amount, repeat history | Accept with coaching or re-sort |
| Load rejected by receiver | Origin and receiver evidence, agreed threshold, custody | Return, redirect, dispose, or dispute |
| Safety or controlled-material issue | Material identity, exposure, containment, specialist guidance | Hold and route to qualified handling |
| Repeated issue at same source | Prior cases, shift or area, container design, coaching results | Change the operating control and verify effectiveness |
A contamination log should not become a list of blame labels with no material, source, threshold, or receiving evidence.
Connect the exception to the load, site, stream, pickup, receiver, and evidence reference.
Record the prohibited or unexpected material, estimated extent, severity, likely source, and whether safety or compliance is affected.
Assign a reviewer and due date, then record acceptance with coaching, re-sort, return, redirect, disposal, dispute, and responsibility.
Corrective action should match the source and mechanism rather than repeat a universal training response.
Move, relabel, lock, resize, or separate the service point when the wrong users or materials reach it.
Change collection frequency, storage, prep, sorting, or handoff timing when overflow or degraded material causes the issue.
Clarify the accepted profile, evidence threshold, receiving rule, or dispute path when the source and receiver interpret quality differently.
Jodoo lets teams adapt severity, evidence, disposition, responsibility, and corrective-action fields without code.
A team can configure the review in hours and refine it as real cases reveal which evidence leads to fair, useful decisions.Jodoo fits the human review after contamination or rejection, where context, responsibility, corrective action, and repeat patterns matter.
Evidence capture, severity, source context, native review, disposition, responsibility, corrective action, and verification.
Keep optical sorting, camera recognition, laboratory analysis, hazardous-material identification, and commercial charging engines where needed.
Attach or reference the specialist finding, then use Jodoo to make and follow through on the operating decision.
Record the load, site, stream, receiver, exception type, time, observer, contaminant or variance, evidence, severity, likely source, reviewer, due date, disposition, responsibility, corrective action, and verification or repeat status.
No. Severity, disposition, responsibility, and commercial charge are separate decisions. Compare the material profile and origin evidence with receiver evidence before assigning responsibility.
Yes. Conditional fields and native workflow can route different materials, severities, disputes, and corrective actions to the appropriate reviewer without code.
Open the populated queue to see pending, coached, and disputed examples. Then adapt severity, review, disposition, and repeat-pattern views to your materials and partners.
Open the contamination log