Disclosure request register
Configure topics, periods, owners, reviewers, due dates, source references, evidence, status, versions, and sign-off.
Coordinate disclosure requests, source data, evidence, review comments, approvals, versions, open issues, and handoff to the approved reporting or filing system.
Start free. No credit card required.
ESG disclosure management software coordinates the controlled path from disclosure requirements to source data, evidence, drafting inputs, review comments, approvals, and final handoff. Jodoo can manage the operating records and sign-off workflow demonstrated here; it does not prove native framework libraries, report authoring, XBRL tagging, assurance, or regulatory filing.
The application shown above connects each disclosure request, source value, evidence item, and reviewer decision to its owner, reporting period, supporting evidence, review status, exception, decision, and next action.
For sustainability reporting, finance, legal, compliance, data owners, internal audit, and disclosure reviewers, every summary should remain traceable to the record and evidence that produced it.
Record the disclosure topic, reporting entity, period, requested value or narrative input, method, owner, reviewer, due date, and evidence requirement.
Attach the source record, calculation inputs, files, explanations, assumptions, prior value, and responsible contributor.
Return incomplete inputs, retain reviewer comments and decisions, resolve changes, and preserve the approved version and sign-off.
Export or integrate governed values and evidence to the authorized report-authoring, assurance, tagging, or filing process.
Configure topics, periods, owners, reviewers, due dates, source references, evidence, status, versions, and sign-off.
Keep corrections, explanations, reviewer comments, decisions, resubmissions, and approval history on the same record.
Monitor completion, lateness, disputes, material changes, evidence gaps, sign-off, and handoff by entity or disclosure topic.
Business administrators can adapt requests, fields, reviewers, evidence rules, queues, and readiness dashboards while specialist tools continue to own native authoring, tagging, assurance, or filing.
These are bounded planning estimates, not guaranteed savings. Actual elapsed time depends on data quality, governance, integrations, testing, and the complexity of the change.
The demonstrated Jodoo workspace does not prove native ESRS, GRI, ISSB, SASB, SEC, or other framework content; XBRL tagging; report composition; assurance management; or regulatory submission. Validate the required specialist output independently.
ESG disclosure management software coordinates the controlled path from disclosure requirements to source data, evidence, drafting inputs, review comments, approvals, and final handoff. Jodoo can manage the operating records and sign-off workflow demonstrated here; it does not prove native framework libraries, report authoring, XBRL tagging, assurance, or regulatory filing.
Start with define the request, collect source support, review and resolve comments, hand off the approved input. The underlying disclosure request, source value, evidence item, and reviewer decision, owner, period, evidence, exception, decision, and next action should remain reviewable.
Use Jodoo when the disclosure bottleneck is cross-functional evidence and approval. Many contributors provide values, explanations, and files. Review comments and corrected versions must remain traceable. Readiness depends on visible ownership and due dates. A specialist platform or reporting process owns final authoring, tagging, assurance, or filing. The demonstrated Jodoo workspace does not prove native ESRS, GRI, ISSB, SASB, SEC, or other framework content; XBRL tagging; report composition; assurance management; or regulatory submission. Validate the required specialist output independently.
The demonstrated Jodoo workspace does not prove native ESRS, GRI, ISSB, SASB, SEC, or other framework content; XBRL tagging; report composition; assurance management; or regulatory submission. Validate the required specialist output independently.
Test one normal case and one missing, late, disputed, high-risk, or returned case from define the request through hand off the approved input. Confirm that each result opens the source record and evidence behind it.