Configurable assessment model
Change questions, evidence, roles, scores, topic weights, review steps, and views for the approved assessment scope.
ESG assessment software
ESG Assessment Software for Evidence and Improvement Plans
Assess ESG practices by entity, site, or program using evidence, reviewer notes, findings, scores, action plans, verification, and reassessment.
- Make every score explainable through questions, evidence, and reviewer notes.
- Separate current maturity, risk, findings, and action status.
- Reassess using the same history instead of rebuilding a new spreadsheet.
Start free. No credit card required.
Built for ESG, sustainability, internal audit, compliance, risk, operations, and business-unit reviewers.Use it when the ESG assessment, evidence item, finding, and improvement action must stay connected to evidence, ownership, review, and follow-up.Questions and evidence vary by entity, site, or program.
How ESG assessment software works
Make ESG assessments explainable from score to source evidence
ESG assessment software structures how an organization, site, program, or business unit is evaluated against approved environmental, social, and governance criteria. Jodoo can configure the questionnaire, evidence, review, scoring, findings, and action plan; it does not create an independent rating, certify performance, or replace a qualified materiality assessment.
The application shown above connects each ESG assessment, evidence item, finding, and improvement action to its owner, reporting period, supporting evidence, review status, exception, decision, and next action.
ESG assessment, evidence item, finding, and improvement action workflow
Move an ESG assessment from evidence request to verified improvement
For ESG, sustainability, internal audit, compliance, risk, operations, and business-unit reviewers, every summary should remain traceable to the record and evidence that produced it.
- 01
Define scope and criteria
Set the entity, site, period, approved topics, questions, scoring method, evidence requirement, reviewer, and reassessment date.
- 02
Collect responses and evidence
Capture answers, documents, source references, comments, owners, and declared gaps in one controlled assessment.
- 03
Review and record findings
Apply the approved scoring method, document reviewer notes, identify gaps, set severity, and preserve disputed or returned items.
- 04
Improve and reassess
Assign actions, due dates, evidence, verification, closure, residual concern, and the next assessment cycle.
Controls for ESG assessment software
The assessment controls to test with a real evidence set
Explainable review
Keep each answer, file, note, score, exception, and reviewer decision connected instead of publishing an unexplained total.
Improvement tracking
Turn gaps into actions with owners, due dates, supplier or site responses, verification, and reassessment.
Adapt the ESG assessment, evidence item, finding, and improvement action workflow
Adapt assessment questions and review paths as the program matures
ESG owners can change forms, evidence rules, reviewer roles, scoring fields, action workflows, and dashboards after approving the assessment design.
- Add a topic-specific question and evidence requirement.
- Route a high-severity gap to a specialist reviewer.
- Create a reassessment queue for incomplete or expired evidence.
Illustrative change cycle
Add an assessment topic, reviewer path, and action view
- Conventional change queue
- 3–12 business daysFor questionnaire, workflow, reporting, testing, and release changes.
- Configurable in Jodoo
- 1–4 hoursFor a trained administrator after the assessment owner approves the criteria.
These are bounded planning estimates, not guaranteed savings. Actual elapsed time depends on data quality, governance, integrations, testing, and the complexity of the change.
Fit, boundaries, and ownership
Use Jodoo for transparent internal assessments and improvement workflow
A strong Jodoo fit
- Questions and evidence vary by entity, site, or program.
- Reviewers need notes, returns, and decision history.
- Findings must create accountable improvement work.
- The assessment method is approved and maintained by qualified owners.
Independent ratings, certification, and materiality judgment require qualified providers
Jodoo does not independently rate or certify an organization, validate claims, determine material topics, provide external controversy data, or guarantee framework alignment. Treat configured scores as the organization’s method, not an external rating.
FAQs
ESG assessment software questions
What is ESG assessment software?
ESG assessment software structures how an organization, site, program, or business unit is evaluated against approved environmental, social, and governance criteria. Jodoo can configure the questionnaire, evidence, review, scoring, findings, and action plan; it does not create an independent rating, certify performance, or replace a qualified materiality assessment.
What should ESG assessment software include?
Start with define scope and criteria, collect responses and evidence, review and record findings, improve and reassess. The underlying ESG assessment, evidence item, finding, and improvement action, owner, period, evidence, exception, decision, and next action should remain reviewable.
Can Jodoo be used for ESG assessment software?
Use Jodoo for transparent internal assessments and improvement workflow. Questions and evidence vary by entity, site, or program. Reviewers need notes, returns, and decision history. Findings must create accountable improvement work. The assessment method is approved and maintained by qualified owners. Jodoo does not independently rate or certify an organization, validate claims, determine material topics, provide external controversy data, or guarantee framework alignment. Treat configured scores as the organization’s method, not an external rating.
When should a team use specialist software instead of Jodoo for ESG assessment software?
Jodoo does not independently rate or certify an organization, validate claims, determine material topics, provide external controversy data, or guarantee framework alignment. Treat configured scores as the organization’s method, not an external rating.
How should a team evaluate this application?
Test one normal case and one missing, late, disputed, high-risk, or returned case from define scope and criteria through improve and reassess. Confirm that each result opens the source record and evidence behind it.