Sign up

Platform

PlatformApp builderForm builderWorkflowDashboardIntegration

Solutions

Order & inventoryProduction orderLean managementMaintenanceAfter-sales work orderCRMProject managementTask managementConstruction

AI Templates

AI Templates

Resources

Help docsQuickstart guidePartnersCommunityTemplatesBlogAbout usSecurity

Pricing

Pricing
Sign up
AI Templates
Guides
ESG Software Guide: Data, Reporting, Controls & Selection
ESG software guide

ESG Software Guide: Data, Reporting, Controls & Selection

Learn how ESG software connects environmental, social, and governance data, evidence, reviews, dashboards, reporting inputs, actions, and system boundaries.

ESG software helps an organization collect, govern, review, analyze, and act on environmental, social, and governance information. The right category depends on the job: operational data collection, ESG reporting, carbon accounting, compliance, supplier due diligence, program management, or specialist disclosure and assurance.

Use the ESG applicationRead the implementation guide
Operating model

Build the ESG software record chain before choosing more features

Follow one material measure from define the reporting and decision scope through report, investigate, and improve, including a missing or disputed evidence case.

01

ESG software: definition and purpose

ESG software helps an organization collect, govern, review, analyze, and act on environmental, social, and governance information. The right category depends on the job: operational data collection, ESG reporting, carbon accounting, compliance, supplier due diligence, program management, or specialist disclosure and assurance.

  • Choose software by the operating task it must own, not by the broad ESG label.
  • Require traceable evidence, definitions, review, correction, and change history before relying on dashboards.
  • Test how trained business administrators can change fields, roles, validation, workflows, and views as the program evolves.
02

Define the reporting and decision scope

List the entities, sites, periods, material topics, stakeholders, decisions, frameworks, and system owners the program must support.

03

Collect source data and evidence

Assign contributors, use stable units and periods, preserve sources and attachments, and route incomplete submissions back for correction.

04

Review, calculate, and approve

Apply documented methods, factors, validation, reviewer decisions, access controls, and change history before using a value.

05

Report, investigate, and improve

Use dashboards and reporting outputs to find gaps, risks, trends, and overdue actions, then open the underlying record and owner.

06

Keep the system boundary explicit

A useful implementation names the system that owns every source, calculation, framework mapping, approval, evidence item, and filing output. Jodoo can coordinate configurable records and workflow without claiming specialist capabilities that have not been implemented and verified.

  • Framework mapping, regulatory filing, assurance workpapers, external ratings, and specialized calculation engines may require specialist products.
  • Scope 3, product footprint, life-cycle assessment, and financed-emissions requirements need verified data and methodology depth.
  • Jodoo is strongest as a configurable operating, evidence, review, action, and dashboard layer around the systems of record.
Core records

Records behind ESG software

Test normal, missing, disputed, overdue, corrected, and approved cases. Every summary should open the source record and review history behind it.

RecordWhat it keepsControl questionPrimary owner
Entity and reporting scopeOrganization, site, boundary, period, owner, material topic.Are contributors reporting against the same scope?Sustainability and finance
Indicator and source dataMeasure, unit, method, source, contributor, evidence, status.Can the value be explained and reproduced?Operational data owner
Review and controlValidation, reviewer, decision, correction, approval, history.Who accepted the value and what changed?ESG controller or reviewer
Finding and actionGap, severity, owner, due date, response, verification, closure.Does a reported problem become accountable work?Business and ESG owner
Dashboard and report inputDefinition, period, filter, aggregation, source records.Can every number be opened back to evidence?Management and reporting team
Implementation

Implement ESG software around one complete evidence-to-decision loop

Begin with one material topic and a small contributor group, prove the evidence and review chain, then expand only after definitions and ownership are stable.

The first release should be narrow enough to operate and complete enough to expose source, ownership, calculation, evidence, review, exception, and dashboard problems.

01Step 1

Define one governed data set

Choose one entity, period, material topic, metric definition, owner, and evidence standard.

  • Document the scope and unit.
  • Name source and review owners.
  • Define missing and disputed states.
02Step 2

Run normal and exception cases

Submit complete, missing, late, corrected, and disputed values through the same process.

  • Test permissions and reminders.
  • Preserve review notes and history.
  • Confirm correction does not erase prior context.
03Step 3

Prove dashboard traceability

Open every metric back to the underlying value, evidence, method, reviewer, and unresolved action.

  • Document filters and definitions.
  • Review incomplete source records.
  • Expand only after the control works.
Templates

Records that support ESG software

Templates can support one evidence or corrective-action step. The complete operating model remains responsible for source data, ownership, review, decisions, dashboards, and change history.

Best template to start withStart with one governed reporting record

Use a focused evidence or action template for one gap, then use the complete ESG workspace when contributors, reviews, calculations, dashboards, findings, and actions must stay connected.

Audit Evidence Collection Form TemplateAudit Evidence Collection Form TemplateUse an Audit Evidence Collection Form to manage intake forms, review status, owner handoffs, and follow-up views with clear owners, status visibility.Audit Action Tracker SoftwareAudit Action Tracker SoftwareTrack audit findings, corrective actions, owners, severity, due dates, evidence, verification, overdue work, and closeout in one audit action system.Supplier Risk RegisterSupplier Risk RegisterUse a supplier risk register to track supplier risks, scores, evidence, mitigation owners, review status, and follow-up actions.
Related template groups

Continue from ESG software to the operating task

Run ESG management workflowsPrepare governed ESG reporting inputsManage ESG data and evidenceBuild an ESG dashboardCoordinate ESG complianceManage ESG risks and controlsRun an ESG assessmentPrepare disclosure evidenceManage carbon activity and factorsAdapt carbon accounting by industryRun sustainability performance follow-upManage environmental records and actionsAssess supplier ESG evidenceOperate client ESG programsStart ESG operations with a small teamExplore ESG software by industry
FAQ

ESG software FAQ

What is ESG software?

ESG software organizes the data, evidence, calculations, reviews, dashboards, reporting inputs, risks, and actions used to manage environmental, social, and governance performance.

What is the difference between ESG software and sustainability software?

The categories overlap. ESG software often emphasizes governed metrics, reporting, risk, and stakeholder disclosure; sustainability software can also cover initiatives, goals, resource use, operational improvement, and broader program management.

Can Jodoo support ESG reporting?

Jodoo can collect and govern operational ESG records, evidence, reviews, findings, actions, and dashboards. Confirm framework mapping, filing formats, assurance, Scope 3, and other specialist requirements separately.

How should a buyer compare ESG software?

Run the same source-data, missing-evidence, correction, approval, dashboard drill-down, and action-follow-up cases in every finalist, then compare system boundary, change effort, governance, integrations, security, and total ownership.