Report and contain
Record time, location, people or property involved, immediate action and supporting evidence.
Give security supervisors one queue for site incidents, severity, evidence, investigation status, assigned actions and review decisions—linked to the original dispatch or patrol exception.
This page is for operational physical-security incidents. Cybersecurity incident response, SIEM and SOC tooling are separate categories.
Free for up to five users. No credit card required.
Adapt fields, workflows, and dashboards without code. Explore 1,000+ app templates and use cases →
A closed label is not enough. Managers need to see whether immediate risk is controlled, evidence is complete and follow-up is actually finished.
Record time, location, people or property involved, immediate action and supporting evidence.
Assign an owner, clarify facts and create the required client, facilities, safety or access follow-up.
A supervisor accepts the record, returns it for correction or escalates the event before closure.
A useful queue tells a supervisor why an incident is still open.
The event is recorded and immediate risk may be controlled, but investigation has not finished.
Facts, evidence, responsibility or impact still need clarification.
The investigation identified work that has not yet been completed.
Evidence and follow-up are ready for a supervisor decision.
The form focuses on the decision context without asking the reporting guard to make every management judgment.
Identify the incident type, exact site location and when it occurred and was reported.
Describe people, property and access context without exposing unnecessary personal information.
Record immediate control, owner, follow-up requirement, evidence and review decision.
Dashboards should help managers ask where process, post orders or client controls need to change.
Keep critical and high events visible until the exact follow-up is accepted.
Look for recurring access, alarm, property or safety events by site.
Separate response speed from investigation and corrective-action lead time.
The live app demonstrates physical-security reporting, investigation, corrective work and supervisor review. It is not a cybersecurity incident-response, SIEM or SOC product.
No. This page addresses physical-security and guard-operation incidents such as access violations, property events, alarms, aggressive behavior and safety concerns.
Yes. The native review workflow can return a record for correction, keep reviewer fields controlled and preserve the incident in the review queue.
Yes. Use shared identifiers and related fields to connect the initial response or patrol exception to the incident and its follow-up.
Investigation questions, evidence gaps, assigned actions, client commitments and the next review decision should remain visible until resolved.
Yes. Authorized Jodoo administrators can add fields, adjust forms, change dashboards and refine workflows without rebuilding the application in code. Test material changes in a controlled copy before using them in live operations.
Pilot one or two sites with representative day and night shifts. Validate post orders, credential checks, patrol exceptions, incident review and handover before expanding the model.
Submit an incomplete incident, return it for correction and verify that the corrected evidence reaches the supervisor without losing the original context.