Policy
Defines purpose, scope, principle, authority, expected behavior, accountability, and exceptions.
Keep the governing rule, current procedure, process owner, trigger, steps, completion evidence, exception path, and review decision connected—without turning every instruction into another policy file.
The example makes the boundary visible: policies set expectations; procedures explain how work is performed and what proves completion.
Free for up to five users. No credit card required.
Adapt fields, workflows, and dashboards without code. Explore 1,000+ app templates and use cases
A policy should remain readable as a governing decision. The procedure can change steps, roles, tools, and evidence without obscuring that policy.
Defines purpose, scope, principle, authority, expected behavior, accountability, and exceptions.
Defines trigger, responsible roles, sequence, decisions, systems, evidence, completion, and escalation.
Explains why either document changes, the impact, who reviews it, and what version will replace the current one.
Lives in the operational workflow—such as an approved expense, completed access review, or closed safety action—not merely in the procedure file.
See SOP and document control →Operational changes are frequent. The control is knowing what changed, which policy it supports, who approved it, and when the new method became effective.
Link the procedure change to its governing policy and current versions.
Name changed roles, systems, forms, training, risks, and evidence.
Test whether a person can perform the task, handle exceptions, and show completion.
Publish the new version, remove obsolete instructions, brief the audience, and schedule the next review.
Put information where people can use and maintain it.
| Need | Best home | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Principle, authority, or mandatory rule | Policy | Stable governing statement |
| Detailed task sequence and role handoff | Procedure | Readable operating method |
| Current assignment, deadline, approval, and evidence | Live workflow record | Changes per case and needs accountability |
| Job aid or quick reminder | Checklist or work instruction | Used at the point of work |
| Temporary departure from a rule | Exception or waiver record | Needs risk ownership, conditions, and expiry |
A dedicated authoring system may be best for structured manuals and complex document control. Jodoo fits when procedures must connect to configurable forms, approvals, operating records, and exceptions.
When the procedure must create or update accountable operational work and business administrators need to change it quickly.
When controlled authoring, reusable content blocks, redlining, multichannel publishing, or formal records management dominates.
Keep approved content in the document system and link it to the Jodoo workflow that captures each execution and exception.
A policy states the governing expectation and authority. A procedure explains how people perform a defined task, including roles, steps, evidence, decisions, and exceptions.
No. Create a procedure when consistent execution needs more detail than the policy provides. One policy may govern several procedures, and a procedure may reference several controls.
Yes. Configured forms can link policy, procedure, revision, exception, and operational records while preserving different owners, statuses, and review dates.
Publish the replacement, mark the former version as superseded, remove it from normal access, retain required history, update links and training, and confirm active work uses the current method.
Use a checklist for concise point-of-work verification. Use a procedure when people need sequence, rationale, role boundaries, decision rules, and exception handling.
Open the populated App and follow one policy into its procedure, revision, exception, and review records. Then adapt the fields and route to a process your team actually owns.
Use the policy and procedure app