Site A: requirements reviewed
The worker’s relevant evidence and practical observation support the requested task. The supervisor records an authorization with a defined scope, dates and any restrictions.
Plan safety training, follow up on missed sessions and review completion evidence by worker, task and site. Keep training progress separate from permission to work.
Start with the example. Adapt it to your team.
The coordinator needs to know who is booked, who missed a session, whose evidence is waiting for review and which training is overdue.
| Situation | Record in the training queue | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| An induction is due before a site visit | Worker, site, required topic, session and due date. | Arrange the session and confirm who will deliver it. |
| A worker misses the session | Keep the missed attendance and the original requirement. | Arrange a make-up session; do not mark the requirement complete. |
| A provider sends completion evidence | Record the result and attach the relevant evidence. | Send it to the assigned safety training reviewer. |
| Evidence is returned | Keep the correction reason and responsible coordinator. | Correct the submission and send it through review again. |
| Training is accepted | Retain the completion and next review date. | Check any separate credential, practical assessment and work authorization. |
The sample queue includes scheduled, overdue, missed, under-review, correction-needed and completed work. These are fictional examples of the decisions a site coordinator needs to make, not a compliance score.
Training evidence is useful only when it is checked against the work being requested.
The worker’s relevant evidence and practical observation support the requested task. The supervisor records an authorization with a defined scope, dates and any restrictions.
The worker may hold the same general qualification, but the second site’s induction remains unresolved. The second task/site review must not inherit Site A’s permission.
The safety example keeps worker, task and site together on the requirement review and authorization. It does not reduce the decision to one qualified flag on the worker record.
Choose the task and site profile. Check the required training and evidence items rather than using a generic checklist for every location.
Inspect the qualification, its validity and the evidence review. A missing, expired or unreviewed document should have an explicit unresolved action.
Read the current task observation and any essential gap. Record the follow-up needed and any restriction relevant to the supervisor’s review.
Record the named work, dates, decision and reason. A form completion or course attendance alone does not authorize work.
| What changes | What must remain visible | Next review |
|---|---|---|
| A relevant qualification is corrected | The affected worker, task and site need their evidence rechecked. | Inspect the revised record before relying on the previous decision. |
| A qualification expires | The qualification is expired and the associated work review needs attention. | Resolve the missing current evidence and record the appropriate decision. |
| A practical observation reveals an essential gap | Practice needed and the follow-up action. | Supervisor reviews readiness for the named work. |
| An authorization is suspended | Suspension remains visible even if evidence is later accepted. | The responsible supervisor must explicitly review the situation. |
| Authorization reaches its end date | The scoped permission is expired. | Review the new period rather than silently extending it. |
Set your own task and site requirements, evidence prompts, review steps and supervisor responsibilities. Jodoo lets business administrators maintain those records and views as sites or work scopes change. The app does not supply regulatory standards or make a legal compliance determination.
Keep incident reporting in your EHS workflow and use the renewal tracker for qualification follow-up. This safety app is a separate example; combining its records with another workspace requires deliberate configuration.
Not automatically. Review the task and site requirements, current evidence, practical observations, restrictions and applicable approval process. The app records the supervisor’s scoped decision; it does not decide legal or professional eligibility.
Yes. Requirements and authorizations belong to a worker, task and site. A current record at one location does not automatically satisfy another location’s induction or task-specific requirement.
Changes to relevant evidence reopen the associated task-and-site review. Restoring the evidence to accepted does not automatically lift a suspension or replace the supervisor’s decision.
Yes. Keep the worker, employer, site and task together so a contractor’s training is reviewed against the work they will actually do. Record who coordinates the session and who accepts the evidence; a certificate supplied by an employer does not automatically grant site access or work permission.
Explore the sample records, then configure the requirements, fields and working views for your team.