First loss context
Record location, use, cause reported, immediate control, safety concerns and occupancy impact.
Keep what happened on site connected to mitigation, scope, estimates, evidence and the final recommendation instead of rebuilding the claim after every handoff.
The gallery opens with a populated property inspection view, followed by a real phone form, estimate comparison, authority queue and reopened-claim control.
Free for up to five users. No credit card required.
Adapt fields, workflows, and dashboards without code. Explore 1,000+ app templates and use cases
The gallery shows populated sample data in Jodoo. Open a view to inspect the records and decisions, then install a copy to adapt fields, roles and workflow.
The inspection should create usable claim evidence, not a separate report that someone retypes later.
Record location, use, cause reported, immediate control, safety concerns and occupancy impact.
Capture affected areas, items, photos, readings, repairability and the follow-up evidence still required.
Track invited providers, response, scope assumptions, selected work and completion evidence.
Connect inspection findings and estimate comparison to the supported amount and authority route.
Property claims often change after drying, opening up or specialist review.
Do not present the inspection as complete while readings, causation or a specialist report remains due.
Record what could not be inspected and the control needed before a follow-up visit.
Compare scope and assumptions rather than selecting only on gross price.
Reopen or extend the review without overwriting the original scope and decision history.
One claim can involve claimant, handler, surveyor, mitigation vendor, repairer and authority reviewer.
A focused mobile form with the claim, location and required evidence already in context.
Inspection gaps, provider responses, customer commitments and the next due action.
A concise recommendation linked to evidence, comparison and exceptions.
Aging, inspection follow-up, exposure and authority backlog across the portfolio.
This keeps the inspection credible and the recommendation reviewable.
| Record | Capture now | Decide later |
|---|---|---|
| Cause | Observed indicators and reported event | Coverage or liability position |
| Damage | Location, material, dimensions and condition | Repair versus replacement scope |
| Control | Isolation, mitigation and safety action | Further work or escalation |
| Estimate | Provider scope, assumptions and amount | Preferred scope and recommended amount |
| Closure | Work and communication evidence | Whether every commitment is complete |
Property teams can adapt the questions, evidence and handoffs for different buildings, loss causes and provider models while keeping field observations attached to the final recommendation.
A property-loss workflow can be assembled quickly and refined by operations teams as inspection standards, provider steps and authority thresholds change.Show the claim and location in context, then collect cause indicators, affected areas, immediate controls, measurements, photos and required follow-up.
Keep provider assumptions, exclusions, quantities and clarification state visible alongside each estimate.
Bring inspected scope, selected estimate, unresolved questions and authority band into the reviewer task.
The field-to-decision workflow should preserve observed facts and operating actions without presenting those records as automatic coverage or payment determination.
Site inspection, mitigation, provider response, scope comparison, evidence gaps, recommendation, human authorization and completion follow-up.
Reference policy, customer, geospatial, document and financial records when another platform owns their full detail or control.
Jodoo does not automatically decide causation or coverage, value specialist damage, set reserves, execute payment or guarantee compliance.
Yes. Build a focused phone form for location, cause indicators, affected areas, measurements, photos, immediate control and required follow-up. Test it on the devices and field conditions your team uses.
Yes. Link the inspection, evidence and provider estimates to the same claim so reviewers can compare scope assumptions and see which questions remain open.
Retain the original inspection and decision, then record the newly discovered damage, revised scope, supporting evidence, owner and review path rather than overwriting history.
No. It organizes facts, evidence, estimates, recommendations and human review. Keep policy rules and formal coverage decisions with the process or specialist platform that owns them.
Open the mobile inspection and populated property views, then adapt the questions, provider steps and authority path to your claims operation.
Use this property claims App