Safety teams replacing paper hazard reports
Fit when site observations still arrive on paper, in chats, or as after-the-fact notes, and the team needs structured hazard records from accessible field and office entry points.
EHS solution
Hazard Identification and Risk Control Solution
Turn workplace hazard reporting, hazard assessment, and risk control into one EHS workflow: accessible hazard reports, automatically calculated LEC risk scores, Low / Medium / High / Critical classifications, risk-based control plans, owners, due dates, inspections, and corrective action follow-up.
Closed-loop EHS workflowFrom field report to verified control
IdentifyAssessControlInspectImprove
Field inputHazard report intake
Every on-site worker can be included in hazard reporting with photos, location, and context.
LEC
LEC Risk Assessment EngineLikelihood, Exposure, and Consequence calculate the risk score.
LowMediumHighCritical
Control planRisk-based actions
- Control measures
- Owner and due date
- Verification and closeout
Execution traceabilityInspections and dashboards
Overdue actions, control progress, high-risk areas, and closeout status stay connected.
Solution overview
Turn hazard reports into traceable control
Most safety teams already have policies. The real gap is execution: hazards are reported on paper, risk scores are calculated manually, control actions move through verbal follow-up, and leaders see risk trends too late. Jodoo helps EHS teams digitize the loop from Identify to Assess, Control, Inspect, and Improve without turning the solution into a custom software project.
Use case fit
Use case fit for hazard risk control
Use this solution when the problem is not just a form, but deciding which teams need structured reporting, consistent risk scoring, and traceable control-action follow-up.
EHS managers standardizing LEC risk assessment
Fit when each hazard needs consistent Likelihood (L), Exposure (E), and Consequence (C) inputs, automatic score calculation, and Low / Medium / High / Critical classification for review.
Operations leaders who need control-action visibility and traceability
Fit when leaders need to see which control measures are tied to each risk, who owns them, when they are due, how verification is progressing, and whether corrective actions reached closed-loop closeout.
Closed-loop architecture
How the hazard assessment and risk control workflow runs
Every on-site worker can be included in hazard reporting through accessible entry points, Jodoo automatically calculates the LEC score, classifies the hazard level, links the result to control measures, and keeps owners, due dates, inspections, corrective actions, and dashboards connected.
- 01
Every on-site worker can be included in hazard reporting
Frontline workers are often the first to notice safety hazards. Jodoo helps teams capture reports through QR codes, mobile phones, tablets, desktops, or supervisor-assisted intake for chemical leaks, exposed wiring, slippery floors, working-at-height risks, fire hazards, and other site observations with photos and location context.
- 02
Jodoo aggregates reports into a central risk center
Reported hazards become structured records instead of scattered paper forms or chat messages, giving EHS teams one place to triage, enrich, and assign the risk work.
- 03
The LEC Risk Assessment Engine automatically calculates the risk score
For each hazard assessment, Jodoo uses Likelihood (L), Exposure (E), and Consequence (C) inputs to automatically calculate a risk score and reduce manual lookup or spreadsheet calculation errors.
- 04
Each hazard is classified into Low / Medium / High / Critical risk levels
Risk classification makes follow-up priority clear for supervisors, EHS managers, and leadership, while keeping the underlying hazard score visible for review.
- 05
Risk levels drive the control plan
The risk level drives control measures such as engineering controls, administrative controls, or PPE, plus the responsible owner, due date, and verification status. When enabled, AI-assisted suggestions can help draft control options for safety owner review, while the final control plan remains approved and tracked by the responsible EHS team.
- 06
Inspections and corrective actions close the loop
Control tasks move to responsible owners, inspection schedules verify execution, overdue actions escalate, and dashboards show risk trends, hot areas, completion rates, and corrective action status.
Risk levels
Low / Medium / High / Critical risk levels stay visible
The classification is not a footnote. It is the priority layer that drives owner review, reminders, inspection follow-up, escalation, dashboard reporting, and control-measure traceability.
Low
Track and monitor hazards that need visibility but do not require urgent escalation.
Medium
Assign owners and due dates so routine controls stay visible and do not disappear after assessment.
High
Escalate control actions, inspection follow-up, and overdue work before risk becomes normalized.
Critical
Prioritize immediate owner review, executive visibility, and verified corrective action closeout.
Jodoo advantages
Why Jodoo is different from paper forms or spreadsheets
These advantages focus on the operational shift: Jodoo moves teams from scattered reporting, manual scoring, and verbal follow-up to structured records, calculated risk levels, owned actions, and traceable closeout.
From scattered reports to structured hazard records
Paper forms, photos, and chat messages become one reviewable hazard record instead of separate fragments.
- QR, phone, tablet, desktop, or assisted intake
- Photo evidence, location context, and affected people
- One structured record for every hazard report
From manual scoring to consistent LEC calculation
EHS teams can reduce manual lookup and spreadsheet calculation errors when hazards move into assessed risk levels.
- Likelihood, Exposure, and Consequence inputs
- Instant risk score calculation
- Low / Medium / High / Critical level matching
From verbal follow-up to owned control actions
Control measures become assigned work with owners, due dates, evidence, verification, and escalation instead of staying in meetings or messages.
- Engineering, administrative, and PPE control options
- Owner, due date, verification status, and closeout traceability
- Reminders, escalation, and approval handoffs
From late visibility to traceable closeout
Leaders can see risk trends and also drill into control-measure progress, verification, and corrective action closeout.
- Daily, weekly, monthly, or quarterly inspection schedules
- Corrective action status, overdue work, and closeout progress
- Risk heat maps, trend lines, source records, and traceability
Customer stories
How EHS teams use Jodoo to make hazard work traceable
Goldwind and BASF show how Jodoo supports real EHS digitization in live operations. Goldwind is closest to hazard rectification, risk tracking, safety inspection, and dashboard visibility; BASF adds supporting evidence for risk response, corrective action tracking, and cross-team traceability.
Clean energy manufacturing and operations
Goldwind
Goldwind uses Jodoo for smart EHS operations and contractor safety management across PTW, contractor control, risk tracking, mobile inspection, incident reporting, compliance audit, and analytics dashboards.
$140,000saved in system development and maintenance cost99.8%hazard rectification rate95%PTW approval time reduction
- Goldwind shows hazard rectification and risk tracking moving from paper follow-up into live EHS workflows.
- Safety inspection, issue reporting, incident escalation, and dashboards make control-measure progress and closeout easier to review.
- The 99.8% hazard rectification rate is a Goldwind deployment result, not as a universal product guarantee.
Chemical manufacturing
BASF
BASF shows how Jodoo supports PTW, change management, risk response, incident escalation, corrective action tracking, and cross-team EHS dashboards.
100+custom apps built10+regions and districts covered3+ monthsdeployment time saved
- Risk response, escalation, corrective action tracking, and traceability stay connected across teams.
- This case adds adjacent EHS context rather than serving as a dedicated HIRA implementation example.
- Chemical manufacturing context gives regulated operations a more relevant EHS reference.
Safety boundary
Safety responsibility stays with the EHS team
Jodoo makes the solution visible and trackable without replacing qualified safety judgment.
- Jodoo can calculate scores from configured LEC inputs, but teams define the scoring criteria and review the outcome.
- AI-assisted suggestions can help draft control options when enabled, while safety owners approve the final action plan before execution.
- Dashboards expose risk patterns and overdue work, but EHS leaders still decide policy, accountability, and site-specific controls.
FAQ
Hazard assessment solution questions
Is this different from the hazard assessment guide?
Yes. This solution page explains how the whole EHS hazard identification, hazard assessment, and risk control scenario runs in Jodoo. The guide is better for planning detailed fields, statuses, owners, and checklist structure.
Is this only a hazard report form or risk assessment matrix?
No. A form or matrix captures part of the work. This page covers the complete workflow: accessible hazard reporting, LEC risk assessment, Low / Medium / High / Critical classification, control measures, owner tasks, inspections, corrective actions, and dashboards.
How does Jodoo handle control measure suggestions?
Jodoo connects each risk level to control measures, owners, due dates, and verification status. When enabled, AI-assisted suggestions can help draft engineering controls, administrative controls, or PPE options for safety owner review before the final control plan is approved.
How are Low / Medium / High / Critical levels handled?
Teams configure LEC inputs and scoring rules so each hazard can be calculated and classified into Low, Medium, High, or Critical levels. The level then drives priority, owner assignment, inspection follow-up, and dashboard visibility.
Where do safety CAPA and HIRA corrective action tracking fit?
On this page, safety CAPA workflow, hazard corrective action tracking, and HIRA corrective action tracking refer to the safety follow-up layer after a hazard or risk assessment creates work: owner, due date, evidence, verification, overdue control measures tracking, and closeout. It is not positioned as a general QMS CAPA page.
Can this replace professional EHS judgment?
No. The solution helps digitize reporting, scoring, workflow, evidence, and dashboards. EHS leaders remain responsible for scoring criteria, site-specific controls, approvals, and compliance decisions.