Requests
Requested and confirmed dates, service reason, provider, and replacement arrangements.
Instrument calibration control
Manage calibration across your equipment
Arrange calibration with your providers, review certificates, and decide when equipment can return to use. Keep owners and quality reviewers on the same records.
Free for up to five users. No credit card required.
Adapt fields, workflows, and dashboards without code. Explore 1,000+ app templates and use cases
Preview with sample data. Sign in to explore or install the app.
A service booking is only the beginning
Follow the instrument through four separate decisions, with the original evidence and responsible reviewer visible at each handoff.
- 01
Arrange service
The equipment owner selects the instrument and requests a window. The coordinator confirms the provider and timing, taking access and replacement needs into account.
- 02
Review the result
Match the certificate to the serial number and required scope. Keep as-found (before adjustment) and as-left (after service) results separate, then review the next due date.
- 03
Address failed results
Identify potentially affected work, containment, action owners, and disposition. An adjustment followed by a passing result does not erase the earlier failure.
- 04
Authorize use
In a separate review task, the assigned reviewer records the allowed use and date. Current service, accepted evidence, unresolved impacts, and due-date validity are checked before the decision.
Follow one sample instrument from problem to decision
After signing in, explore the sample before installing your own copy. Start with the work you would need to explain to a colleague.
Inspect an existing case
Open Instrument status and find the torque wrench tagged ASM-TQ-008. Switch to Tool history and select that equipment tag to inspect the result and related decisions. The as-found failure remains visible even though the as-left result passed.
Try the next service request
In an installed copy, open New service request and select an instrument. Add proposed timing and replacement needs; the coordinator then reviews the arrangement. Configure your members and review responsibilities before using the app for real work.
What happened in the sample review
Missing certificate → evidence returned for correction → corrected file retained → unresolved impact cases still blocked use authorization → completed reviews updated the exact instrument. The checks used one authorized administrator with fictional data; they do not certify your team’s access controls.
Start the day with the decision, not just the count
A dashboard is useful when each status leads to a specific record and next action.
| What you see | What it means | What to do next |
|---|---|---|
| A due date is approaching | There is still planning work to do, even if the instrument is currently released. | Check provider lead time, downtime, replacement availability, and the requested service window. |
| Certificate awaiting review | The instrument or file may have returned, but the evidence has not been accepted. | Open the result, check identity and scope, and return incomplete evidence for correction. |
| As-found failure with an as-left pass | The instrument was adjusted or corrected, but earlier work may still need assessment. | Review affected work and document containment and disposition before considering release. |
| Awaiting return to use | An evidence or impact review has progressed; use authorization is still a separate task. | Inspect current evidence and all linked impact cases, then record the authorized scope. |
One instrument identity, several kinds of evidence
The same equipment number connects the work. Separate records preserve what was requested, what was found, and who made each decision.
Equipment tag + serial number
Instrument record
Current accepted result, reviewed due date, use status, and linked history.
Results
Original certificate, scope check, as-found and as-left outcomes, and acceptance.
Impact reviews
Affected work, containment, action ownership, and documented disposition.
Use authorizations
The accepted evidence, permitted use, reviewer decision, and authorization date.
Adapt the handoffs to the way your equipment team works
A new service arrangement
Your provider changes from collection to on-site visits. The coordinator now needs access instructions, a contact, and a replacement-tool plan. Add these to the request and keep the existing instrument and certificate histories intact.
A stronger review rule
Critical torque tools need an additional quality review after an as-found failure. An authorized administrator can adjust the native task routing and review fields. Check both a blocked case and a correctly completed case before using the changed process.
What Jodoo manages—and what your calibration provider does
Use Jodoo to coordinate people and records
It fits teams that receive calibration from qualified providers and need a process that can change with equipment categories, sites, and responsibilities. Forms, linked records, review tasks, and dashboards stay in one configurable application.
Use specialist tools for measurement execution
If you need automated test procedures, documenting-calibrator communication, uncertainty calculations, or laboratory certificate production, assess specialist calibration software. Jodoo can coordinate related business work, but this app does not replace those functions.
Questions about managing calibration
Does Jodoo calibrate instruments or calculate measurement uncertainty?
No. This app coordinates instruments, service arrangements, evidence review, and use authorization. Measurements, uncertainty calculations, and technically valid calibration results remain with your qualified provider or specialist calibration system. Attach the original evidence and have an appropriately qualified reviewer assess it.
Can different sites share the equipment register?
Yes. Use a common instrument identity and location fields, then configure views for each site. Decide separately who can read and change each site’s records: a filtered dashboard is not an access restriction. The example does not come with your locations, member assignments, or site-specific permissions already established.
What happens when the equipment owner or reviewer changes?
Update the responsible member for future work and inspect tasks already in progress. Do not assume a new owner automatically receives every existing review. Use the appropriate task-transfer or reassignment action, retain the earlier decisions, and confirm the next responsible person can see the open work.
Do external calibration providers need a Jodoo account?
Not for your internal coordinator to record a service arrangement and attach a certificate received from the provider. The sample is an internal equipment-control app, not a preconfigured supplier portal. Direct provider submissions require a separately designed access and intake process; do not share internal reviewer permissions with a supplier.
Is the example a validated compliance system?
No. It is a configurable business application with fictional sample records. Your organization must establish its procedures, responsibilities, access controls, technical review, and any required validation. Neither an app status nor an uploaded file establishes metrological traceability or permission to use real equipment.
Choose the calibration task you need to work on
Connect the next service to the instrument’s history
Open the sample instrument register, choose a restricted tool, and follow its certificate and review history. Install a copy when you are ready to configure your team’s process.