Working timesheet approval app

Timesheet approval workflow with returns, locks, and transfer

Start with a populated workflow that keeps the period, affected entries, return reason, correction, decision, approval age, lock, and receiving-system status connected.

The value of an approval workflow is the visible exception path. A submit button without correction history, queue ownership, and transfer status is not enough.

  • Submitted, returned, resubmitted, approved, and transferred periods
  • Manager queue with approval age and exception context
  • Business-owned fields, rules, routes, role views, and measures
The complete approval path

Preserve each state from submission to transfer

Every transition has an accountable actor and evidence.

  1. 01

    Submit a complete period

    The employee reviews entries, totals, missing days, and required context before confirming the period.

    Submission writes the actor, time, total, and visible statement.
  2. 02

    Validate and route

    Rules surface missing, overlapping, overtime, late, or unknown-code records and assign the correct approver.

    The queue shows why each period needs attention.
  3. 03

    Return affected work

    The manager selects the entry, records a reason, and reopens only what needs correction.

    The previous value and return decision remain linked.
  4. 04

    Resubmit and approve

    The employee corrects the work and the manager records the final decision.

    Approved hours and decision time update the period.
  5. 05

    Lock and transfer

    Approved periods join a payroll, billing, or reporting batch and retain receiving status.

    Transferred, rejected, and reconciled records remain traceable.
Queue design

Give each state to the person who can act

Reminder fatigue often comes from sending the right message to the wrong owner.

Employee incomplete

Expected period is missing work or required context.

Employee owns completion.

Manager decision due

A complete period is submitted and waiting for judgment.

Approver owns the elapsed time.

Employee correction due

The manager returned one or more entries with a reason.

Employee owns the targeted change.

Escalation due

The current owner has not acted within the agreed window.

Escalation follows policy, not a generic reminder blast.

Transfer resolution due

The receiving system rejected or blocked an approved period.

Operations or integration owner resolves the response.
Adapt the workflow in Jodoo

Change the rule and the interface together

A new exception should not appear in the form but disappear from the queue and dashboard.

Fragmented change

The team updates the form, emails a new instruction, changes a spreadsheet filter, and hopes the export still matches.

Connected Jodoo change

A trained administrator adds the field, validation, return reason, approver, queue, permission, reminder, and measure around the same lifecycle.

  • Require a reason above an overtime threshold
  • Add a delegate for one approval period
  • Route contractors to a separate handoff
  • Create an aging view for regional managers
Approval health

Measure the process, not the manager’s inbox

The dashboard should show where decisions stall and let the owner open the affected periods.

%

First-pass approval

Periods approved without a correction return.

Days

Approval age

Time submitted periods have waited for a decision.

%

Correction completion

Returned periods corrected and resubmitted by the agreed window.

Count

Transfer rejects

Approved periods blocked by the receiving process.

Approval workflow questions

Questions about returns, locks, and escalation

Should the whole timesheet be returned for one bad entry?

Not always. Keep the period and decision visible, reopen the affected entry or subset, record the reason, and let the employee resubmit the corrected work.

Can approvals be delegated?

Yes. Record the delegate, scope, reason, and effective dates so the final decision remains accountable.

When should the period lock?

Use the point that protects the downstream process—often final approval or handoff. Corrections after that point need a controlled reopen and a new decision.

Can business users change the workflow?

Trained administrators can change approved fields, rules, routes, views, reminders, and dashboards. Sensitive policy, integration, architecture, or major redesign still needs appropriate review.

Run the complete exception path before rollout

Use a normal period, missing day, overtime case, targeted return, correction, approval delay, lock, transfer reject, and reconciliation. The workflow should explain every state without side messages.

Use the approval workflow