Program profile
Reference the client, claim type, authority band, service standard and reporting segment.
Run a repeatable claim lifecycle while preserving the program, client, authority and reporting differences that make third-party administration operationally demanding.
The first view shows client programs, SLA milestones, delegated authority, reporting state and blockers together, followed by the supporting claim and authorization records.
Free for up to five users. No credit card required.
Adapt fields, workflows, and dashboards without code. Explore 1,000+ app templates and use cases
The gallery shows populated sample data in Jodoo. Open a view to inspect the records and decisions, then install a copy to adapt fields, roles and workflow.
The same handler may work across programs with different evidence, authority and reporting rules.
Reference the client, claim type, authority band, service standard and reporting segment.
Use a consistent claim file while revealing program-specific intake, evidence and escalation requirements.
Show when a recommendation exceeds delegated authority and route it to the correct client or senior reviewer.
Give each client a bounded view of volume, age, exposure, service and exception without exposing unrelated portfolios.
Aging alone does not explain whether a claim was handled well.
Track whether the claimant or client received the reference, owner and next step on time.
Keep the next meaningful action and due date visible even while an external response is pending.
Separate handler completion from the time waiting for client or senior approval.
Close the communication promise only when the promised update or action is recorded.
A client should be able to understand why age, exposure or service changed.
Drill from portfolio trend into claims waiting at each lifecycle point.
Retain the current exposure and the evidence or event that changed it.
Distinguish claimant, provider, employer, authority and internal delays.
Show where incomplete closure or new evidence created post-close work.
A configurable system should make program differences explicit, not rely on handler memory.
| Area | Configure by program | What to test |
|---|---|---|
| Intake | Required facts and documents | Incomplete submission reaches the right queue |
| Authority | Amount bands and reviewers | Over-authority recommendation cannot self-authorize |
| Service | Milestones and pause reasons | Due and overdue views match the contract |
| Reporting | Client segmentation and definitions | Drilldown reconciles to claim records |
| Handoff | Core, client and finance integrations | Authorized outcomes reach the correct owner |
A TPA can use one operating foundation while varying required facts, service milestones, authority and reporting for each mandate. Business administrators can maintain those differences without code.
TPA teams can launch a substantial client-program workflow quickly and keep refining milestones, queues and reports as mandates change.Attach the client, mandate, reporting segment, evidence requirements and authority band to the operating record.
Track claimant, provider, employer, client and internal blockers so service reporting explains who owns the next move.
Build portfolio views and drilldowns for the relevant program without exposing unrelated clients or internal fields.
The TPA layer should make program obligations and handoffs visible while respecting the client, carrier, finance and document platforms that own specialist controls.
Program-aware intake, handler actions, evidence follow-up, service milestones, authority escalation, client commitments and management reporting.
Reference or synchronize policy, customer, payment, recovery and document data according to each client’s agreed system ownership.
Coverage, regulated benefits, fraud detection, reserves and payment execution remain with the qualified systems and teams responsible for them.
It must preserve the client program, delegated authority, service commitments, data boundaries and reporting definitions while handlers execute a consistent claim lifecycle.
Yes. Use program references, conditional fields, authority paths and filtered reporting so shared work remains consistent while client requirements stay explicit.
Track each meaningful milestone, its owner, due rule and pause reason. Separate work completed by the TPA from time waiting for a claimant, provider, employer or client decision.
Yes. Configure bounded views and dashboards for the appropriate program and role, then verify record and field permissions against the client data agreement.
Open the populated client-program view, then adapt authority, service milestones, reporting and exception handling to the mandates you administer.
Use this TPA claims App