Use language the requester recognizes
Lead with the result—new employee access, replacement device, approved software, data extract, or account change—rather than an internal team name or tool category.
Publish understandable service offerings, collect decision-ready requests, and keep eligibility, policy, ownership, fulfilment, commitments, and improvement aligned.
The live gallery begins with the service and configuration portfolio, then shows what requesters and fulfilment teams need from an offering. It treats the catalogue as a maintained service product—not a static menu of form links.
Free for up to five users. No credit card required.
Adapt fields, workflows, and dashboards without code. Explore 1,000+ app templates and use cases
The first view is the service portfolio. The fulfilment and performance tabs show whether the published offering is operationally real.
A useful catalogue helps people select the right service and sets an operationally achievable expectation.
Lead with the result—new employee access, replacement device, approved software, data extract, or account change—rather than an internal team name or tool category.
Explain who can request the offering, supported locations or systems, prerequisites, exclusions, cost or approval conditions, expected delivery time, and the route for a nonstandard need.
Ask for the information necessary to determine eligibility, authorization, configuration, scheduling, fulfilment, and confirmation. Use conditional sections rather than showing every possible field.
The catalogue, workflow, service ownership, and measurement should change together.
Relate each request offering to the owning service, team, dependencies, configuration context, policies, commitment, and escalation route so fulfilment does not operate as an isolated form.
When eligibility, evidence, approval, fulfilment steps, target, or availability changes, retain the version that governed in-flight requests and communicate the new promise clearly.
Stop new selection when an offering is unavailable, route users to an approved alternative, and preserve the historical offering on existing records instead of silently rewriting it.
A catalogue becomes valuable when it reduces confusion and makes delivery more reliable.
Review abandoned requests, incorrect offering choices, returned information, manual rerouting, and common free-text demand to identify where catalogue language or coverage is weak.
Measure authorization delay, dependency wait, rework, overdue tasks, exception use, and requester confirmation by offering rather than relying on one overall queue average.
Give an owner the evidence to simplify data, change policy, automate a step, adjust a commitment, add an offering, or retire one that no longer produces a useful outcome.
These objects relate, but each answers a different question.
| Object | Question answered | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Service | What ongoing capability do users depend on? | Identity and access service |
| Offering | What specific outcome can someone request? | Add access to an approved application |
| Request | Who needs what, under which conditions, now? | Taylor requests analyst access for the finance app |
| Fulfilment task | What work delivers the approved outcome? | Provision role and verify sign-in |
Use connected records for service ownership, requestable offerings, eligibility, required information, fulfilment design, commitments, and improvement signals.
The result is a catalogue whose language, workflow, and performance can improve together without a code release.Describe the outcome, eligibility, choices, required information, expected timing, and support path without exposing internal team structure.
Connect each offering to its fulfilment steps, authorizers, owners, calendars, target rules, and exception paths.
Stop new selection, present the replacement, preserve the historical offering on existing requests, and update linked workflow and communications.
Build and maintain offerings where the request experience and fulfilment rules need regular business-owned change.
Service and offering records, eligibility, conditional questions, policy, authorization, fulfilment, ownership, commitments, and retirement history.
Keep procurement, identity, asset discovery, finance, and specialist provisioning data in their systems while the catalogue explains the user-facing promise.
A large prebuilt enterprise catalogue, advanced entitlement engines, portfolio financials, discovery-fed CMDB relationships, or procurement integration is required at launch.
The catalogue defines services and requestable offerings, including outcome, eligibility, policy, data, ownership, fulfilment, and commitments. The portal is the user interface through which people discover and submit them.
No. Publish repeatable services that users can understand and that a team can fulfil consistently. Use another intake route for novel demand, consultation, exceptions, or work that lacks a stable offering.
Prevent new selection, explain the replacement or alternative, preserve the historical offering on existing requests, and update linked policy, workflow, commitments, and communications.
Yes. Authorized builders can change the relevant fields, forms, workflows, permissions, automation, and dashboards without code while keeping changes governed and tested.
Yes. Jodoo’s free plan supports up to five users with no credit card required, so a small team can test this working scenario before checking current limits for a wider rollout.
Explore services, offerings, request fulfilment, commitments, and service history before adapting the portfolio to your users and operating teams.
Explore the service catalogue