Incoming acceptance
Accepted receipts or lots against the applicable inspected population, with exclusions visible.
Review quality, delivery, response and audit evidence with category context, preserve exceptions behind the number and decide whether to maintain, expand, reduce, condition or suspend supplier scope.
The working app includes scorecards across supplier categories and explicit Maintain, Expand, Reduce, Conditional and Suspend decisions—not a decorative KPI dashboard.
Start with Jodoo’s Free plan for up to five users. No credit card required.
A score should support a decision, not hide the evidence.
Accepted receipts or lots against the applicable inspected population, with exclusions visible.
Performance against agreed dates and the part of delay the supplier can control.
Containment and response timeliness plus verified effectiveness—not response speed alone.
Current verified audit evidence, major findings and unresolved follow-up.
Quarterly review is not enough when material facts change tomorrow.
Bring current quality, delivery, audit, evidence and improvement facts into the period.
Retain exceptions, denominator changes and business context behind the score.
Let the relevant quality, procurement and operations owners examine the same evidence.
Maintain, expand, reduce, condition or suspend a defined scope.
Create improvement actions, sourcing changes or a requalification trigger and verify completion.
The calculation must remain interpretable.
A 100% rate from one receipt is not equivalent to 100% across hundreds of lots.
A single critical escape can matter more than many minor events; sustained direction can matter more than one period.
The first pilot should prove the numbers, exceptions and resulting action—not merely render charts.
Record population, exclusions, period, source system, owner and calculation so suppliers and reviewers can interpret the same result.
Include stable, improving, declining and low-volume suppliers to expose weak denominators and category differences before wider use.
Open defects, late deliveries, corrective responses and audit findings behind the score instead of discussing the aggregate alone.
Maintain, expand, reduce, condition or suspend a defined scope and create the improvement or sourcing work needed to carry it out.
Choose measures tied to decisions: quality acceptance, defects or escapes, delivery, responsiveness, corrective-action effectiveness, audit results, risk and improvement commitments. Keep definitions and denominators visible.
Use a regular cadence suited to supplier criticality plus event-driven reviews after major defects, audit findings, delivery disruption, certificate lapse or significant change.
Not necessarily. Measures and weights should reflect category and risk, while definitions stay consistent enough to explain comparisons. Keep the applicable model and denominator with each review.
Open the underlying evidence, determine severity and trend, then assign improvement, corrective action, sourcing change, requalification or scope restriction with an accountable follow-up date.
Yes. A trained Jodoo administrator can add a measure, category rule, review view or decision route in tens of minutes to a few hours. Preserve the model used for each historical period and test the revised calculation before the next review.
Inspect low quality, delivery or response results, open the evidence and test the decision and follow-up that the scorecard creates.